Scott gets big win at Barclays, has long way to go to reach No. 1 ranking

Adam Scott
Getty Images
Adam Scott won The Barclays, but even wins in the next three FedExCup playoff events wouldn't boost him past Tiger Woods to the top of the world ranking.
Doug Ferguson
Associated Press

Series: PGA Tour

Published: Monday, August 26, 2013 | 6:07 p.m.

JERSEY CITY, N.J. – Two snapshots from Liberty National could illustrate the fortunes and future at the top of the world golf ranking.

One was of Tiger Woods dropping to his hands and knees with back pain after hitting a shot so far left that it landed in a pond on the other side of an adjacent fairway. The other was of Masters champion Adam Scott swinging his driver, a beautiful blend of balance, rhythm and power.

Scott went on to win The Barclays, partly because of his bogey-free 66 Sunday, mostly because the other contenders fell apart down the stretch. No apologies were necessary. Woods has won plenty of tournaments that way.

''I feel like I've been given a bit of a gift,'' Scott said. ''But I'll take it.''

Woods finished one shot behind, unable to atone for three bad swings that led to bogeys on the back nine.

The big picture was Monday morning.

Scott moved up to a career-best No. 2 in the world, but he's really no closer to Woods than he ever has been.

Even if the Australian were to win the next three FedExCup playoff events – about as easy as winning four straight majors – he still wouldn't replace Woods at No. 1. That's how big the gap is between Woods and the rest of golf.

Woods hasn't won a major in five years, but he's still winning against strong fields. And even though nagging injuries seem to be piling up, he's winning more than anyone else.

That's what Scott will have to learn to do if he wants to be the best in the world.

This is only the second time Scott has had a multiple-win season on the PGA Tour. The other was in 2004, when he won The Players Championship and the Booz Allen Classic at Congressional. Around the world, he has won at least once in each of the last 13 seasons, but never more than two wins in any season.

Scott now has 21 wins worldwide, leaving him 70 behind Woods.

Woods is never a fair comparison for anyone. Scott said as much seven years ago when asked what it was like to grow up dreaming about being the best in the world and being stuck in the same generation as a guy like Woods.

''The hardest thing now is for young kids to realize this Tiger benchmark is out of most everyone's league,'' he said at the end of the 2006 season, when Woods had won six straight PGA Tour events.

He jokingly said that day he would have to wait until Woods went through another swing change. That time has come and gone.

Scott at least entered the conversation for PGA Tour player of the year with his win at The Barclays, though that depends on the next month. Winning another FedExCup playoff event would give him three victories, including a major. Is that enough to trump five wins and no majors?

Then again, it was Scott who last week didn't hesitate when asked who has had the best year in golf so far.

''Five wins? Tiger's had the best year,'' he said. ''If you think winning a major is what you base success on, then if you haven't (won), you haven't had a great year. But winning ... I've always based it around winning events, and I don't think one major makes up for five tournaments.''

To see Scott swing a club is to ask why he's not winning more often. Scott prides himself on consistency, but since his playoff win at Augusta National, he had only one serious look at winning this year until The Barclays. That was at the British Open, where he had the lead on the back nine at Muirfield until making four straight bogeys as Phil Mickelson finished off one of the great final rounds in a major to win the claret jug.

Vijay Singh hit his stride in 2004 and won nine times. Rory McIlroy took over at No. 1 last year when he won five times.

That's where Scott needs to be. Perhaps this is a start.

''To have multiple wins on the PGA Tour is a pretty good accomplishment, I think,'' Scott said. ''There aren't too many guys doing it regularly, and I'm not, either. But I'd like to. I'm trying to jump off that springboard and win more regularly, and I think I'm going about it the right way.''

One thing Scott and Woods have in common is their schedule. Neither plays a lot of tournament golf. Scott has 41 events on his world ranking ledger over the last two years while Woods has 39. That's by design. Scott is playing less and getting more out of it. The weeks at his home in the Bahamas are spent on quality practice.

It's working. He's the Masters champion. He's No. 2 in the world. He is playing the best golf of his career.

''It's interesting,'' Scott said. ''I felt like earlier in my career, I gave myself a lot more chances to win tournaments because I played a lot more. The last couple of years, my focus shifted a bit and I changed my schedule and played a lot less tournaments. So I think I've got less opportunity to win. I've focused on the bigger tournaments, which are not easy to win – not that any others are.

''Kind of developed my game into being more consistent, performing in the big ones,'' he said. ''And now I'm trying to adapt that to be a winner on a more frequent basis.''

Only when that happens – if it happens – will the No. 1 ranking come into view.




WHAT?!?! A few comps!?!? Tiger won the Players and 2 WGC events this year. I challenge you to check out the fields in any of those 3 events and if they are not as loaded as a major or the Barclays I'll eat my hat. You really show your lack of golf knowledge when you come on here and claim those 3 are nothing noteworthy. The article also shows that Adam Scott plays around the same number of tourneys that Tiger does. I'm not saying that Tiger will break Jack's record. I am saying that he will win the most golf tourneys ever. And I also believe, like Bill Hass (a real golf professional) commented, when someone like you come on and tries to be little anyone who wins 5 tournaments during the year, they really show their lack of knowledge of what the PGA season is all about. And who are you to decide what or what not Tiger has to prove? I doubt, especially after reading this ill informed post you wrote, that Tiger , or any other golfer, would use your guidelines as a blueprint to decide how successful their career is.


Woods has won a few comps this year but nothing note worthy. Invitational’s and the odd PGA tour event. He picks and chooses so is odds are better. At all majors thought, when all the worlds best are on course, he falls way short. I think Jacks 18 majors is pretty safe for awhile, from anyone. Scott never had the fire in his guts like the early Woods did, maybe now he will. Time will tell but if Woods is not careful he will do permanent damage to his back. He has nothing to prove anymore, maybe he should sit a few games out and take care of his back first.