A Masters for the aged? Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson hope so

Published on
A Masters for the aged? Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson hope so

AUGUSTA, Ga. — They’re older now, no longer the 20-somethings who together helped usher golf into a new era.

The evidence of that isn’t in their golf swings, but in their appearance. When Tiger Woods takes off his hat after a round, there’s a pronounced bald spot in the back and Phil Mickelson looks, well, like a guy should look as he approaches the half century mark in life.

In most other sports they wouldn’t contenders. In most other sports they wouldn’t even be playing.

But here at the Masters, against a field loaded with young talent, they’re among the favorites.

A Masters for the ages? How about one for the aged?

“We’re at the tail end of our careers, we both know that,” Woods said. “He’s 47, I believe, and I’m 42, and we have had a great 20-year battle, hopefully we’ll have a few more. But we understand where we are in the game now versus where we were in our early 20s, battling for who is going to be No. 1. And that was then and certainly this is now.”

RELATED: Tee times, pairings for Rounds 1 and 2 from the Masters

If there’s any comfort for both players it lies in the history of the Masters, where Jack Nicklaus not only won at the age of 46 in 1986 but was contending on the final day a dozen years later at the age of 58.

Add in the fact they own seven green jackets between them and it’s not so farfetched they will at least be in contention on the weekend.

“I would give Phil a much better chance to win than Tiger,” said Butch Harmon, who taught Woods when he was young and was with him when he won the 1997 Masters in historic fashion. “Not that I’m saying Tiger can’t win because I wouldn’t say Tiger can’t do anything because he will prove you wrong. But Tiger hasn’t won in a long time.”

Harmon also worked with Mickelson for a period of time and believes he is riding a wave of confidence after winning the Mexico championship last month.

“Phil is still competitive and I don’t think Phil Mickelson gets the credit he should get,” Harmon said. “He’s won 43 tournaments and five majors in the Tiger Woods era. No one else has come close to that, mainly because Tiger was winning all the others.”

MORE: Sharma eyes his first Masters

Both guys have played well lately, with Woods contending in his latest comeback and Mickelson winning in Mexico.

It was Woods, of course, who transformed golf 21 years ago by winning his first Masters at the age of 21. Beset alternately by back and personal problems in recent years, though, he’s been stuck on 14 major championships for a decade now.

Woods talked Tuesday about how his swing speeds are still what they were before he hurt his back and he showed he can not only keep up with the younger players off the tee but sometimes hit it past them.

And, of course, he’s got the experience that playing Augusta National in competition 78 times over 20 Masters can bring.

“I’ve played well over the years, I’ve won here a few times, but all those years that I’ve won, one part of my game has certainly stood out,” Woods said. “And whether it’s driving the ball like I did in ’97 and putting it a couple years where I really putted well or hitting my irons and hitting a lot of greens, but not only missing, missing in the correct spots every single time, there’s got to be some sort of certain part of my game that’s got to be on, and hopefully this will be one of those weeks.”

Harmon, for one, thinks nothing would be better for golf should that happen.

“I think the jury’s still out on him,” Harmon said. “I would hope he could do it because it would be the best thing in the world for the game. The reincarnation of Tiger Woods at age 42 would be pretty cool.”

This article was written by Tim Dahlberg from The Associated Press and was legally licensed through the NewsCred publisher network. Please direct all licensing questions to